Shame! Najib sold MALAYSIA dead cheap to PARAYAN ZIONIST JEWS

APCO CEO Staples was among the witnesses scheduled to testify before the committee today

They’re sneaky. They lie. They’re evil. They think everyone else is an animal and therefore without souls. They’re the most despicable people on the planet to say the least. These evil doers are behind Hollywood, the porn industry, race mixing,the homosexual agenda …. you name it … and they’re the ones orchestrating

RELATED ARTICLE Refer Zionist regime to criminal court:Refer Najib TO PEOPLE'S COURT spenting RM76.8 million to APCO

READMORE

Najib spent RM76.8 million to be with Barack obama how much did he pay to Saifull to be with him K.J HAS THE ANSWER

While we watch astounded at Umno’s audacious attempt to ram a crumbling sodomy case through court with questionable legal maneuvers that no fair court would tolerate, we are left wondering at the mentality behind Umno.

Is Umno aware that the world is watching and a conviction that turns Anwar Ibrahim into a victim of political persecution would be more damaging to BN than a free Anwar or a tottering MCA and a near-defunct MIC combined?

What could possibly drive Umno to undertake this risky misadventure when retribution from a public backlash is staring at them in the face?

No government which has to face elections will do what Umno does. Sodomy II is more in tune with a military dictatorship like Myanmar or a banana republic like Zimbabwe rather than a modern democracy like Malaysia (or pseudo-democracy if you want to nitpick).

To understand why this circus trial is going on we must delve deep into Umno’s mentality. The first characteristic of Umno’s mentality is that it is infantile. To a young child the present eclipse the future in importance. It is pointless to bribe a little child to give up something in his hands for something better in future.

We can see Umno’s infantile mentality clearly in the Perak power grab. It will not give up the immediate prize of Perak even if threatened with the loss of Federal power in the next election. Hence the incarceration of Anwar is an immediate benefit which outweighs any thoughts of future repercussion.

RELATED ARTICLE

April 1, 2010

Najib’s Freemason: APCO Malaysia mission an opportunistic Freemason infiltration which allows ZIONIST APCO to gain control imperceptibly,

What to do, they live in a nation of fools that think Israel has a monopoly on world sympathies.

Mr. Anwar has come under attack for his friendships with Jews before, and he has defended those links. So it's disappointing to see him jump on the anti-Israel populist bandwagon now.

Wall Street Journal

A

Anwar faces censure and a possible suspension if the committee rules against him. — file pic

KUALA LUMPUR, June 9 — Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim today made another attempt to have his lawyer present during his hearing before the Rights and Privileges Committee.

Anwar said he has made a request to the committee to allow his lawyer, Datuk Ambiga Sreenivasan, to make a submission to the panel.

“I appealed to the committee repeatedly to allow us to make an application, to explain why the lawyer’s presence is necessary,” said Anwar after the start of the second day of the committee’s hearing.

He claimed the committee had allowed him to be represented by a lawyer yesterday, but the decision was later overturned.

“But what has not been decided is whether the lawyer is allowed to make submissions,” said Anwar.

“They are deliberating on it so we will see,” he added.

The opposition leader is facing the powerful Rights and Privileges Committee over his remarks in Parliament early this year linking Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s 1 Malaysia with the One Israel initiative.

Anwar added that he wants to be present with his lawyer when the APCO Worldwide representative and other witnesses offer their evidence.

“How do you know what is being said? It could be denial or irresponsible remarks,” said Anwar when reiterating that he had in his possession documents to back his allegations.

APCO CEO Staples was among the witnesses scheduled to testify before the committee today.

Witnesses seen entering the committee’s room today were APCO chief executive officer Brad Staples, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz, Kota Belud MP Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan and Najib’s press secretary, Datuk Tengku Sariffuddin Tengku Ahmad.

Anwar in his speech to debate the royal address during the last Parliament sitting questioned why Najib had engaged APCO, which he claimed was previously hired by the Israeli government.

The Permatang Pauh MP also alleged that the 1 Malaysia initiative was a carbon copy of former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak’s One Israel.

APCO had denied its links with One Israel and said that the 1 Malaysia initiative was conceived prior to the company’s appointment.

Najib announced the 1 Malaysia concept when taking office on April 3 last year, pledging to listen to the people and declaring that “the era where the government knows best is over.”

Anwar was referred to the Rights and Privileges Committee after the Dewan Rakyat was not satisfied with the explanation given by the former deputy prime minister.

The committee is chaired by Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia and consists of four Barisan Nasional (BN) members and two Pakatan Rakyat (PR) MPs.

The BN representatives are Deputy Speaker Datuk Ronald Kiandee (Beluran), Datuk Seri Dr Fong Chan Onn (Alor Gajah), Datuk Nancy Shukri (Batang Sadong) and Datuk Razali Ibrahim (Muar).

PR is represented by PKR’s Subang MP Sivarasa Rasiah and DAP chairman Karpal Singh (Bukit Gelugor).

Anwar will likely face censure and a possible suspension notice if found guilty of misleading the Dewan Rakyat by the committee.

Nations from France to Brazil have leaped to condemn Israel for lawfully defending its security by raiding a terrorist-backed flotilla heading for Gaza, but at least there are dissident political voices in those countries. Not so in Malaysia.

Over the past week, Prime Minister Najib Razak and opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim have, if anything, competed to denounce the Middle Eastern democracy. Mr. Najib didn't even wait to find out the facts before calling for the "whole world" to "condemn" the "cruel regime." Mr. Anwar dubbed Israel's raid a "brutal act" and organized a protest in which the crowd burned Israeli flags and posters of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. On Monday, parliament unanimously passed a motion condemning the "excessive force" used against the "humanitarian aid ship."

Never mind that the more we find out about the flotilla, the less innocent it seems. An Istanbul-based Islamic "charity" with ties to terrorist groups purchased three of the six boats and sent activists to staff them. The flotilla ignored repeated warnings from Israeli authorities. When commandos landed on the ships, they were greeted with clubs and knives. There were 12 Malaysians on those ships.

Malaysia's political class has a long history of stoking anti-Semitism, so from that perspective Mr. Najib's remarks aren't a surprise. His political mentor, Mahathir Mohamed, was fond of Jewish conspiracy theories and labeled Israel a "terrorist state." The ruling United Malays National Organization's youth wing has carried on these traditions, with its leader last week calling on protestors to "go to Gaza to defeat the Israeli regime" if authorities stopped another "aid" ship.

Less understandable are the actions of the opposition coalition led by Mr. Anwar, which pitches itself as a new kind of secular political movement that bridges ethnic and religious differences. Mr. Anwar has come under attack for his friendships with Jews before, and he has defended those links. So it's disappointing to see him jump on the anti-Israel populist bandwagon now.

Whatever their calculations, Malaysia's politicians tarnish their nation's image when they engage in jingoistic rhetoric and pander to radical Islamists. Ordinary Malaysians deserve better.

Why did the world’s most famous, and priciest, makers of writing instruments launch a lakhpati pen in the name of a man famous for wearing nothing more than a handspun loincloth? They did not honour Mahatma Gandhi because research turned up fascinating data suggesting that the world’s millionaires had overnight converted into apostles of non-violence and abandoned their T-bone steaks for goat’s milk. The reason was that its marketing department identified India as their best growing market.

Modest ink pens used to be a staple of Indian stores, with stained-finger schoolchildren as customers. The triumph of the ball pen has reduced that to a quaint memory. Having lost its base, the pen showed astonishing powers of reinvention; it became upwardly mobile without doing much more than it did in its populist avatar. Within the last decade, high-end pen shops have moved from an occasional presence in Delhi’s five-star boutiques to high-rent markets where the elite come to spend a thousand rupees for a hundred grams of cheese. If the price of these pens makes you stagger, just remember that cheesy millionaires do not stagger easily.

Why have branded pens become such a hit with the Indian rich? Is it because the rich have shifted their primary loyalty from the goddess Lakshmi to the goddess Saraswati? Have they become so literary that, after a day rewriting balance sheets, they spend their evenings stringing pearls of wisdom in variable verse? Alas, not true. The wheeler has not turned into a dealer in poetic phrases.

The demand for pricey pens has multiplied because it has risen from the tarmac of legitimate need, lifted towards pocket-showoffs, and now rocketed into the stratosphere of ruling class affectation. It has become a most desirable gift for those in power because it comes attached with respectability. This is not considered a bribe, mind you. The most expensive pen in history would be inadequate as substitute for cash for a minister on closure of a deal. The pen, particularly one with contorted shapes on its head, is just right as a gesture towards the new royalty in return for an audience, even if the new royals use it only to scribble their initials. It is the kind of male jewellery that helps to keep a file moving. The movement may or may not be in the right direction, but why risk immobility in mid-journey?

Delhi’s corruption has a caste system, in addition to being creative. The most widespread form is lifestyle protection, or enhancement. A successful collection of Diwali hampers, for instance, could be sufficient to stock your bar through winter; and if you are influential enough, then Christmas will ensure a heady time till Holi; and Holi will keep you in high spirits till June. Monsoon may be the only time when you actually have to pay for anything spiritual. Pens and handmade watches are reserved for the heaven-born.

As happens so often, the pen-marketing chaps got the facts right and conclusions wrong. Identifying India as the market was totally correct; making Gandhi the icon was silly. The Indian who buys boutique pens dismisses Gandhi as a sermonizing bore with crackpot theories, the sort of hero safer dead than around, useful for street names but not for the boardroom or indeed the Cabinet. A pencil might be more appropriately named after Gandhi, preferably one sold in stub sizes.

A Nehru pen could have been a better idea, for Nehru was an extremely good author. Gandhi, on the other hand, was a great crusader-journalist. The Mahatma communicated through the journals he edited, and their names were as didactic as their content. Gandhi was also an inveterate scribbler; no politician has written more letters, quite often on scraps of paper, for he was the ultimate conservationist. On his days of silence, Gandhi conducted full conversations, and even crucial talks with Viceroys, by scribbling his part of the dialogue carefully on small bits of paper.

By Fedwa Wazwaz, Engage Minnesota

The Islamic Resource Group (IRG), an educational outreach organization, has done more than 1,900 presentations reaching more than 65,000 Minnesotans in face-to-face interaction. The number one question people want IRG speakers to answer is: What does Islam say about terrorism? Sadly, we are forced to prove that we condemned terrorism. This is a situation no other faith community faces where it is held responsible for the actions of a few over what we have neither control nor influence.

The constant repetition of the alleged failure to condemn terrorism has pushed our voices behind an intellectual apartheid wall; hence, nothing we say is heard.

As proof of the assertion that Muslims condemned terrorism, consider what was said at the 39th annual convention of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) in Washington D.C., at which Dr. Badawi was a key presenter. At this conference, Muslim scholars analyzed the September 11 terrorist attacks in light of Islamic teachings. This was one year after the attacks on the World Trade Center. The convention commenced on a Friday afternoon with a prayer for the victims of September 11. Speakers went on to condemn the terrorist attacks before a large Muslim audience of 40,000, myself included.

In the aftermath of the attacks, Ingrid Mattson, a professor of Islamic studies and Muslim-Christian relations at Hartford Seminary and the new president of ISNA, explained in The New York Times that “Islamic law is very clear: Terrorism is not permitted. Even in a legitimate war — even if Osama bin Laden were a legitimate head of state, which he’s not — you’re not permitted to indiscriminately kill civilians just to create terror in the general population.”

On Sept. 15, 2002, Shaykh Abdul Aziz al-Shaikh, the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, proclaimed that “Hijacking planes, terrorizing innocent people and shedding blood constitute a form of injustice that cannot be tolerated by Islam, which views them as gross crimes and sinful acts.”

These were hardly exceptions. On the web site The American Muslim , one can see a large compilation of condemnations of the attacks and condolences to the American people by Muslim leaders. In addition, the Council on American Islamic Relations, the most prominent Muslim civil rights organization in the U.S., compiled a 68-page document after the September 11 attacks, and has a special Anti-Terrorism page on their website with voices of Muslims from all over the world (See http://www.cair.com/AmericanMuslims/AntiTerrorism.aspx)

For many Americans — and for me in particular as a Palestinian American — one of the most disturbing images was the celebration of a few Palestinian youths after the 9/11 tragedy. This image was played over and over again in a provocative manner on CNN and FOX and mentioned by many nationally known commentators. This reinforced the myth that somehow Arabs and Muslims were gloating at American loss of life and pain!

This one image became a tool to drown out the condemnations and condolences by every Palestinian leader and organization, student associations, municipalities, mosques, churches and other groups. Students here and abroad held vigils, moments of silence and even blood drives.

The mainstream media, however, largely ignored these actions, as our voices remained behind an intellectual apartheid wall.

The final – and perhaps most important – lecture delivered at the 2002 Islamic Society convention concerned Muslim/non-Muslim relations. Dr. Jamal Badawi, a prominent Muslim scholar on Christian-Muslim relations, discussed the challenges posed by some commentators and religious leaders against the Qur’an and Islam.

RELATED ARTICLE OH MY GOD THE ZIONIST PARAIYAN ARE SO SACRED We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus — and nonbelievers.

Badawi Explains Coexistence

Badawi explained that Islam does not divide the world into believers and infidels. God addresses people, “O mankind,” over 200 times in the Qur’an and “O children of Adam,” many times. The term for Jews and Christians is not infidel, but “Ahlil Kitab,” or People of the Book.Badawi elaborated on coexistence by explaining that the inclusive address “O mankind,” is an address by the Divine that embraces all. “It reminds humanity that they belong to one family with the same set of parents, albeit a diverse family. This is a reminder that diversity in unity and unity within diversity are possible. Humanity is like a bouquet of flowers in which each flower is beautiful in its own right, yet, the combination of all flowers and the rich diversity of their colors is more beautiful. This sweeping statement in the Qur’an about broad human brotherhood is a profound basis for peace for and among all.”

Badawi added, “The basic principle in dealing with non-Muslims is ‘birr.’” There is no good definition of the word birr in English; however, it can be most closely translated to mean honor, compassion and kindness. God uses the same word “birr” when advising Muslims on how to deal with their parents. Furthermore, the Qur’an clearly states there is “no compulsion in religion.”

Finally, Badawi touched upon the word “jihad,” which means struggle, but is often mistranslated as “holy war.” Jihad has many forms, from the spiritual struggle against the self to the physical struggle against aggressors, whether Muslims or non-Muslims.

Badawi emphasized, “This [physical struggle against aggressors] is not a holy war. It is the lesser of two evils. There is nothing holy about destruction, killing or suffering.”

As we dialogue and work on solutions to make our country secure, we must realize the importance of understanding Islam and Muslims to ensure that our policies and solutions for security are within the spirit of justice and peace, not revenge and hatred.

U.S. Must Lead by Example

As a Muslim, the feeling I get is – unless Muslims en masse are virgin pure and undefiled – they stand condemned. The loudest voices making these false accusations are those who have justified all violations of international law in attacking Muslims. Strangely, this is the logic of honor killing, where men get away with acts of promiscuity, yet women are condemned for not being virgin pure and undefiled. If we are going to demand Muslims condemn terrorism, we must lead by example by condemning acts of terrorism by all, including state-sponsored terrorism. Even if those states claim to be democratic.

The weak always imitate the strong. If we are sincere in our desire to end terrorism, we must realize that it is a fruitless exercise to condemn violence by the weak and support it and condone it by those in power.

Yet, despite these forces who seek to silence and marginalize the Muslim American community, Muslims will continue to persevere in their attempts to build bridges of understanding and find common ground with other faith communities.

On February 20th, The Islamic Resource Group and the University of St. Thomas have invited Dr. Jamal Badawi to Minnesota to give a presentation titled “Is Coexistence Feasible? – An Islamic Response.” This event is free and open to the public. Your attendance is welcome. We need to work together to end all forms of violence and extremism against all.

Fedwa Wazwaz is a Palestinian-American freelance writer who lives in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota.

If the pen chaps had wanted to do themselves a favour, and lift the image of their brand with a dedication to the generation that gave us freedom, then they should have opted for Jawaharlal’s father Motilal Nehru. Motilal, a man with epicurean panache, a personification of honour in its widest sense, a patrician who entertained (before he became a Gandhian on the eve of the Khilafat movement) with a generosity that princes might match if they had both taste and money in addition to heritage. He may have never written a book, but he certainly pored over a brief; he was one of the great lawyers of his time. One can visualize the finest contemporary pens, not to mention quality ink, strewn across his handsome teak writing desk.

What would Gandhi have done if someone had gifted him a lakhpati pen? Laughed with toothless abandon, and immediately lost the gift.